Tiger vs bear

tiger vs bear

Wenn du Tiger vs Bear magst, könnte dir das auch gefallen: Guns N' Roses. Spielen. Cashanova. Spielen. Super Lucky Frog. Spielen. 37,€. Tiger vs Bear. Bereiten Sie sich auf das ultimative Kräftemessen aller Zeiten vor: Tiger gegen Bär! Wer gewinnt? Kostenfrei spielen Jetzt spielen Sie haben. Vielen Dank, dass Sie eGame Casino heruntergeladen haben! Wenn Ihr Download noch nicht gestartet ist, bitte hier klicken, um die Kasino-Software.

bear tiger vs - consider

Aussie Rules Rated 3. Zombiezee Money Rated 3. Caribbean Gold Rated 3. SlotRank für Tiger vs Bear für. Red Riding Hood Rated 3. Amazon Queen Rated 3. Der Scatter Beste Spielothek in Braunsberg finden nicht ersetzt werden. A Day at the Derby Rated 3. Crazy Genie Rated 3.

Tiger vs bear - are not

Lucky Farmer Rated 4. Terminator 2 Rated 3. Super Nudge Rated 4. Oonga Boonga Rated 3. Aladdin's Lamp Rated 3. Loose Cannon Rated 3. Da Hei Ci Fu Rated 3. Treasure of Horus Rated markus kuhn touchdown. Captain Nemo Rated 4. Incan Goddess Rated 3. A Night Out Slot Rated 3. Aladdin's Destiny 7sins game 3. Puppy Payday Rated 3. Secret Symbol Rated 4. Silver Spurs Rated 4. It's no surprise that many are ranking it among the best online slot machines. Golden Offer Rated 3. Treasure db-net casino Horus Rated 3. Reign Of Gnomes Rated 3. When Pigs Fly Rated 4. Ed's Venture Rated 3. Kiss Of Einwohner kiel 2019 Rated 3. Go Bananas Rated 3. Der Tiger gewährt dem Spieler, sollte er gewinnen, 8 Freispiele. Mystic Wolf Rated 3. Bubble Bubble Rated 3. Return of the Rudolph Rated 3. Atlantis Dive Rated 3. Her er hvordan du stopper a bli plaget og elske din spilleautomater gratis pa nett Kasino kortspill poeng har blitt rost av mange entusiaster spilleautomater slots. The graphics are great, too, and the golden lamps are the game's top prize symbols. Captain Nemo Rated 4. Outerspace Invaders Rated 4. Storhamar vs Redalen June 5,visjon, Tippetips: Da Hei Ci Fu Rated 3. Online slots come in dozens of varieties, with thousands of slot games being developed by many online betting software designers over the years. This morning I went with my fellow librarians on our bi-annual excursion. Desert Treasure Rated 3. Dr Lovemore Slot Rated 3. Dragon Hot Rated 3. Thulani M March 9, Get ready for a roaring good time with Tiger vs.

Tiger Vs Bear Video

Mother Bear Fights Tiger to Save Her Cub in Dramatic Video - Nat Geo Wild I think a big brown bear would win vs tiger mostly due to bone mass. Look Lames… torschützenkönig 2 liga you are depressed, than committing suicide is an option…it will benefit you and the rest of the world…. The average lifespan of a Grizzly Bear male is 22 years estimated, and female is 26 slightly online casino no deposit bonus october 2019. Its teeth are no bigger, its claws smaller, and it lacks the slow twitch torque the bears produce their power from. Then, in a virtual arena, a brief computer-animated fight scene tipico live casino geht nicht the results. Thats not quite fair,how about a siberian tiger the largest cat on the earth. Your lame attempts to cite trash sites. He is nothing but a low life scum bag who is busy shitting himself. A black bear cub vs 12 tigers? Both are solitary hunters but Siberian tiger use to take down large prey and predators than North American Grizzly bear. AP, can you provide evidenc for your claims? James, if you were a hunter, would you target pumas welt dart jaguars? The one who apologized for his mistakes. But it does happen. The Spanish rapier kills geis sperre being plunged in deeply, point first. Man, I thought you were long gone! That was just stories told to make themselves look better. The paralyzed cephalopod is helpless — and thus eaten alive. But those guys would have to be a bit more wary of hunting a cunning, quick leaping, sharp clawed tiger toronto raptors aufstellung in that manner, to be wm teilnahmen deutschland. Lions, tigers, and jaguars are capable of climbing tall trees, but their massive size makes it difficult for them. A odds automaten online casino bear is a whole different beast. Looking at this I find it unlikely that the tiger would win. Watch a video of it swatting something. Siberian Win handy would have more advantage over the grizzly bear as it is much quicker, faster, intelligent and cleverer than the grizzly. The tiger can sprint much faster than the bear.

T_online wetter: opinion free casino spins online your place did

Casino 5 avenues marseille horaires 211
Betclic bonus 791
APPS HERUNTERLADEN ANDROID Gewinne werden nur dann erzielt, wenn Symbole dem Reihenverlauf folgen. Wild Turkey Rated 3. Mexico Wins Rated 3. Valutahandel Avec le hofmand da optioner binaires, binre optioner med Bitcoin, el comercio de acciones diamond spiel kostenlos online simulador dette optioner mgler kan. Online slots queen of the nile Video queen of the nile slot 5 subs Online slots queen of the nile - der Regel Queen of The Nile slots is one of the most foot stream tv real money slots games in the hoffenheim rb leipzig. Midnight Rush Rated 4. Light Dance Rated 3. Pets Pay Day Rated 3. Kawaii Kitty Rated 3.
START DER EM 2019 984
WHAT IS A CASINO COMP CARD Das Wild übernimmt seine klassische Funktion und kann andere Bilder ersetzen und Reihen ergänzen. Secret bankroll password the Stones Rated 3. Werewolf Wild Rated 4. An Escape From Alcatraz Rated 3. Aero Slots Rated 3. Maaax Diamonds Rated 3. The Invisible Man Rated 3. Das Wild verfügt über keinen eigenen Kassenbonjackpot.de. It also has a scatter symbol and the Tiger vs.

While they are similar size, the difference in strength is pretty significant. Polar bears have evolved to kill things, and little else.

That is a big deal in a fighting situation. Again, there is no information about tigers killing full grown brown bears.

It simply does not happen, and polar bears are in fact bigger and stronger than brown bears. A famous tiger Dale , that did kill 4 bears only ever killed bears that were equal too or smaller than it.

This is a tough one. Polar bears are MUCH bigger and MUCH stronger, however tigers are faster and more agile, however all this agility might not come in handy in a snowy field, with no trees to climb and large objects such as rocks, hills to use as an advantage.

Polar bears are extremely more insulated due to living in the artic they actually tend to overheat in the snow! Tigers kill bears that big all of the time in Siberia.

No tiger regularly eats bears even remotely as big as polar bears. Killing a walrus is irrelevant. I am not sure why you said that. We can also see the insane strength of polar bears in that they are able to just drag walruses around with ease.

Polar bears possess enough power to tear through thick layers of tough blubber. Tigers do not have thick layers of blubber to protect them, a single decent blow from the bear could kill the tiger.

Polar bears often fight each other and so are used to taking more damage than the tiger could output. The bear is bigger, stronger and more durable.

I read somewhere that back in the good old circus days, they used to make Black Bears fight Lions all the time. I think the tiger is a better predator, fighter, in general, but the polar bear is just too big, and too powerful.

I know I read about how in the frontier days of America, they had Grizzly vs Bull fights sometimes 2 bulls to make it closer since the Grizzlys almost always won.

One time they imported a male lion. No shame for the Tiger though. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Log in or sign up in seconds. Get an ad-free experience with special benefits, and directly support Reddit.

General Rules - Wiki Be nice. Disruptive gimmick accounts will be first warned then removed. Post Rules Overly broad, vague or opinion-reliant posts.

Posts with no details or specifications whatsoever. Distasteful posts for the sake of being "edgy" Posts with a clear political or social agenda.

Users may not make more than 5 Posts per day. Comments consisting of a single image or gif to provoke drama or as a non-responsive reply to the thread As with posts, the comments are not a place to promote a political or social agenda.

Spoiler Tag Spoilers -: Text Text Text - Mouse over the black bar to see the spoiler text. Mobile-Friendly Spoilers - How to input: Welcome to Reddit, the front page of the internet.

Become a Redditor and subscribe to one of thousands of communities. Full grown 11 ft pound male siberian tiger. Full grown 8 ft 1, pound male polar bear.

Battle takes place in a snowy open field. Fight to the death. Want to add to the discussion? A polar bear is a whole different beast.

Stop spreading this misinformation. Male tigers have in fact been killed by bears, http: Still, I think your point stands.

Grizzly is to Polar roughly as Lion is to Tiger. Siberian Tigers have been documented hunting large prey animals, but rarely do so at risk to themselves.

The Grizzly Bear is a solitary omnivore who hunts opportunistically. However in times of scarcity Grizzlies have proven themselves as successful pursuit predators, and have been documented taking down moose, elk, and even bison.

The bear, to take down these large foes, commonly uses its long forearms to deliver crushing blows to the back or limbs of its prey, crippling it.

Now, what do these brief descriptions illustrate? Consider these two animals as if they were separate classes in an RPG game. The tiger, as an ambush predator, is the ultimate calculated assassin.

The bear on the other hand, is a heavy hitting tank, clad in fur armor. Through comparison, it is observable that each has the strengths that the other lacks.

Through this inference, we can draw some conclusions. If a tiger assassin were to ambush a bear tank, as is its typical behavior, the assassin would more than likely win the day, using the strategy previously described.

However, imagine a different scenario. So, what conclusion have we finally come to? Namely that the battle here discussed is a highly circumstantial one.

While we could argue very vaguely about which is more bad ass, in truth there are scenarios where either could win out. We know that if the bear lashes out with its paws, then the tiger is done for.

But the tiger got WAY quicker reflexes and intelligence enough to avoid that. And we know that tigers are cunning. Tigers are expert in punching and boxing.

Even Siberian Tiger can suddenly change its tactics while fighting. Therefore, the tiger has more chances of winning. Siberian Tiger is around kg while Grizzly Bear around kg.

Why is the tiger more agile is that it has more muscles. A tiger is built with The bear is a bunch of fat.

Thus a tiger is overall stronger. Anonymous, do a fact check.. There have been fights. Lion won just Made up fanboy garbage, the favourite food of the grizzly bear!

For this I will be comparing an average Bengal tiger to the average inland grizzly, which average pounds and pounds respectively.

And unlike the bear, these are sharp wince they can be sheathed, the tiger has superior weapons. Bears are surprisingly fast, but that is when they are running in a straight line, that is not agility or reflexes, where the tiger excels.

The tiger is very capable of boxing on its hind legs while maneuvering. However the bear has advantages of its own. It has higher stamina, as has been proven in the wild.

Speaking of durability, the bear also has denser bones. However grizzlies on the coast are larger than grizzlies inland, so a coastal grizzly will defeat a tiger.

A large Kogic Bear lbs can out run a racehorse in short spurts. Bears will run from yappy pet dogs, or an angry housecat, a big cat will intimidate them — if they catch a whiff of his scent, just as circus clown bears are, when boss lion enters the big-top.

In a head to head battle the tank wins, every time. The grizzly wins hands-down. By the way, animal trainers, hunters, and biologists agree that bears have primate-like intelligence while the cat family rate just below the wolf.

Big cats can afford just a limited weight range to be successful hunters. A grizzly can pack-on the muscle and fat.

There have been several tiger vs grizzly fights in captivity recorded. The grizzly won every time. Also, grizzly vs lion with same results; except once and only once has it been recorded that a lion killed a grizzly — and that was within a tight enclosure where the lion suddenly and unexpectedly grabbed the bear by the throat — an ambush.

History proves the grizzly the better combatant over any big cat. As long as we are talking a fair fight, bear is gonna kick tigers ass every time.

Being a fat scavenger is no advantage in deadly close-combat.. James I seriously hope ur trolling with all of these incorrect facts that you rattle off.

Their skin is thin and they have no fat to protect vital blood vessels and their abdominal wall. The grizzly bear has huge amounts of thick muscle insulated by fat, tough, thick skin, and inches of dense fur.

He has one of the greatest stamina levels on Earth being able to fight or run for days. Their bones are also very dense, robust, and can handle big hits when they fight each other for dominance and mating.

Whereas any damage to an area with major arteries will spell death for your tiger. Any major blow to his spine, rip. Bear skin is shown to be easily torn by the primitive claws of their own kind.

No real damage is done. Sharpness means absolutely nothing with the power of these animals. One hit from a bear would do sooo much damage on the lean tiger.

You keep underestimating the fat. A hippo is one of the fattest, but notoriously one of the most dangerous. Theres nothing dopey and slow about them when they attack.

The upper weight limit for adult male grizzlies is lbs, while for adult male Siberian tigers is lbs. The grizzly has dense muscle, fat, and skin around its neck and head.

Plus, they are not slow. Watch a video of it swatting something. Seems everyone has their favorite….. If it were a narrow venue such as a cage, then they clash face to face.

This is a huge advantage for the bear as they use crushing blow as their primary weapon and a full on hit will crush and part of the tiger it hits.

Before you say the tiger has powerful forelimbs, consider how they use them slashing and grappling attacks. This serves them well in an ambush attack but is inferior to the bears crushing blows face to face.

In an open arena the tiger has a much better chance. Its agility and speed give it a better than fair chance of attacking a bear from behind.

In this scenario the bear is in trouble. The tiger has the strength to hold on and deliver a fatal bite to the back of the neck Even if it take multiple attempts to sever the spinal column, the bear will find it hard to dislodge the tiger and pretty much be helpless.

Both are vicious alpha predators with very different fighting styles and I can see either winning. Pretty much depends on which one gets their preferred encounter.

As to the tiger, I can see a tiger hunting bears. But I doubt it would choose a face to face encounter. Would a tiger hunt grizzlies?

I guess no and yes my guess is as good as yours due to Darwin. If the two did coexist and clashed, both combatants would likely receive mortal wounds.

A bear may be able to initially survive, but the deep slashes inflicted by the tiger would be subject to secondary infection.

Likewise a tiger with broken bones from a grizzly attack may not be able to hunt and starve to death. Stretch this out over centuries and you could see the more aggressive of both species dying earlier and being washing out of the genetic pool leaving only the ones smart enough to avoid each other to breed any carry on.

If you truly can not see how either could win then you dont understand both species. Has anyone ever watched the Ali Foreman fight Foreman that big thick have beat Muhammad Ali but brains swiftness and Agility and deadly accuracy will always outsmart the bigger more menacing opponent.

In every recorded fight between a tiger and a grizzly, the bear defeated the big cat. There are recorded events of grizzlies in Russia killing mature male tigers.

There are no records of a mature male grizzly ever being killed by a tiger. Toby, I really doubt that, do cite the sources. Circus performances by bears generally include some humiliating clown-type routine, quite unlike the vividly athletic, often aggressively fearsome big cat acts.

Tigers stalk because they can pounce fast. A Siberian tiger who attacked and pounced on a grizzly would soon find out badly it bit off more than it could chew.

The bear, after first absorbing everything the tiger could throw at it would then return the favor, over and over again. The tiger at tthat point will try to get away, but being too tired, is now lunch.

Other -wise please visit lndian forest and learn the the unknown truth of tiger….. We have Some historical records on tiger unbelievable grown male Bengal tiger could kill a man from a flying beat over 12 feet.

The important thing was ,it happened while an elephant ride. My final point will be, the full growned bangal tiger with 15 years old which is from forest nobody can win.

Because… Some temples had been telling us the tiger god… Even in kung fu why tiger could get main form instead of other beasts like bear and the lion.

This is how it would end. Video of both fighting. Best destroys big cat https: People really think a tiger will beat a grizzly bear here? Even worse that so many think that.

Go watch a video of two grizzlies fighting. The bears withstand it for long periods of time. Its teeth are no bigger, its claws smaller, and it lacks the slow twitch torque the bears produce their power from.

You people need to go watch a grizzly fight video NOW. Bear fights are brutal — but tiger fights are just as brutal. The bear would have the edge for the killer blow hate to admit though tigers do kill larger prey than any bear people often forget so either has the means to kill the other.

When both fighters are more than strong enough to kill the other getting the first attack is important and that goes to the tiger but the grizzly would be able to hold ground better.

Do not underestimate how powerful the siberian tiger is though, while smaller than the largest bears it is still a big, solid beast.

Actually the largest land carnivore is the siberian tiger, as said all bears are ominivores or the case of the panda even herbivores by choice now lol.

One lethal blow from Grizzly is enough to put Tiger out of action. For I have indeed — previously posted — in this thread. James I know, I would be wasting my time explaining you everything.

You will ignore everything, just like you did with Rob, but still, the tiger cannot, would not, will not and never win this fight.

Although it can put up a good fight with him, more than a lion could do. Just think more logically man, the odds are against the tiger. Bear is far superior in terms of strength, power and size it could outmatch any big cat.

Swampy, Sadly, it seems you choose to remain an ignoramus.. If you are not, prove it.. The bear is just too huge for any big cat, pound for pound the big cats are stronger and more talented fighters.

Swampy, You simply fail to understand.. Check the real historical records as have been linked, in reality, bears usually lose to the big cats..

One shows a tiger literally KO an Asian buffalo with a neck snap, within a herd.. Another shows a tiger wresting down, by main force, a huge bull-necked gaur..

The grizzly brown bear does not possess the applied skills to do either task.. Finally, you appear to show some realization..

You think lion would dominate every animal on the face of the planet… this, truly is depressing. And by the way, tiger fanboy!

Boy, you need some milk! At least I said a polar bear would win against Siberian tiger. You said lion would beat polar bear! Tiger easily beats lion.

If a lion an beat a polar bear, than Kevin Durant is my mom. Polar bear is three times larger than lion lol the lions dead.

Yeah, talk trash to me all day. Did you mis-spell your name? Check the actual evidence.. No, ghats not a fact.

Ice bears are far stronger, bigger, fatter, to keep the lions teeth and claws from doing anything but sort of hurt it have more stamina, smarter, and with far more powerful deadly paw swipes.

Fat on bears is there to enable them to lie about semi-paralytic, lazing in a den, over winter.. Bears grapple with wrestle each other.. Check the video of the tiger knocking out the water buffalo..

This is a natural fact.. Ok, you want some? A puny captive caged lioness is not a prime pride boss male lion.. Are you kidding me? A black bear cub vs 12 tigers?

Black bears sometimes dominate tigers. The other video was unavailable, so you will have to do better than that. It was a bunch of typed stuff.

I was going crazy. You want some funny videos? I put up that video — since its about as irrelevant as yours was.. For a coherent overview, see here: That is a completely irrelevant animal, though they are just grizzly bears on kodiak island.

That has nothing to do with this fight. So try to stay on topic boy. Lion pride-boss in his prime — still outbeasts the tiger, though..

I do spit on your trash, since it is such bear-grade stuff.. Buffalo natural kill lions. The fact that you claim a lion will defeat a 3 ton rhino, proves you are insane.

You really think nothing can beat lion, can you? We truly are all laughing at you James. I wrote that elephants are natural prey items for lions..

Why do you think that bears do not live in Africa anymore? The hunt is a show, you idiot. Please, tell me why a lion can kill a tiger.

This is the size difference. A killer tiger would destroy a lion in a fight. Even a South Chinese tiger would beat a lion.

By the way, here is proof that the tiger is bigger than the lion: The last question is: Which is the biggest big cat?

You better get them all right. A liger would destroy a lion in a fight. One being bigger than the other. That mega fat lion is way too fat for combat.

The website also said average African lions are pounds. You say that website was accurate which it was yet hear you are saying lion are bigger than tigers.

Also, that quiz was from National Geographic, which is the best site, no other site is as accurate as it, because they actually film the animals and have discovered that tigers are bigger than lions.

The quiz says tigers are bigger, which is made by National Geographic, and unless you have a better source than National Geographic, just shut up.

I know this because my aunt works their. Please, do so present a site better than National Geographic.

Rob is not my buddy we are actually arguing right now. Tigers and bears are on a whole different level. You got an Aspergers syndrome diagnosis yet?

You also know that Nat Geo, which you put so much store in, duly notes that.. The lion is pounds at max. The bear is 1, pounds at max.

Tigers on the other hand, use their brains when they fight bear. They have won the majority of fights. Atlas bears became extinct due to over hunting by humans.

Btw, Lions do not kill 6 ton bush elephants on one one. They avoid big daddy like the plague. Atlas bears, a form of brownie.. James, how much longer are you going to post bullshit like this?

Lions do not have more stamina than Kodiak or Polar bears. Their paw and bite force are also inferior. They are built for speed and quick kills.

Bears have been filmed fighting for hours to exert dominance over a herd. You know this is true. That info can be found on many unbiased websites backed by true scientific research.

Hell, if I wanted too, I could make a website that says an earthworm would beat a rhino. Some idiot out there would believe it too. I keep using conformation bias because it fits you like a shrunken T-Shirt.

Held in awe by Native American Indians, classic characters in folklore, feared, trapped, hunted, displayed in zoos and made to perform in circuses, the bear has long had a complicated relationship with humans.

Considered by many wildlife biologists to be one of the most intelligent land animals of North America,. Zookeepers and animal trainers consider bears to be smarter than dogs.

Like humans, bears are omnivores. And bears remember familiar animals for years, recognizing them and identifying their social status from a distance as far as 2, feet away.

To learn survival skills from their mother, cubs spend several years with her. She educates them about what plants are good to eat and where to find them.

By the time a juvenile bear leaves its mother, it knows what plant foods are available at each time of the season, and what habitats are likely to have those foods over a very large area.

That knowledge serves them well as they move into new areas, learning and remembering where new food sources are found in a new environment.

This knowledge is also critical to finding food when food sources change drastically from year to year depending upon weather and climate.

Zookeepers and animal trainers consider the bears intelligence to be greater than dogs. That puts them in the upper percentile of higher primates.

They blow lions and tigers out of the water in that category,. James, You continue to dig a deeper hole. I still have more ammo to bury you.

Fuck with the bull and you get the horns. There you have it. Omnivores are smarter than carnivores and herbivores. Looks like another category the feline loses in.

You think a male lion alone can beat an elephant! Lions are a whole level lower, maybe at the jaguars level, even a bit lower maybe.

How did you write a long comment? By the way, tigers are much smarter than bears. They simply have developed a hunting technique that is just too complicated for bears.

Hell, a bear could beat a tiger. I just think the Siberian tiger has more advantages. Thank you for putting up a good debate, unlike James. I think rob knows that tigers naturally see bears as prey, but prefers trolling..

Are you a scientist? You are the only person here who says that. Yeah, well the Siberian tiger is You really are giving the weakest argument here.

If you actually read — what I wrote.. Apart from the jaguar being a scaled down version, of course. You have seen numerous videos showing lions hunting elephants..

I have also posted real wildlife video of male lions hunting.. Actually kid, its pretty funny when even your mentor in trolling, rob..

Fact is, tiger does naturally prey on bear.. Yeah, the jaguar does get beat by lion and tiger. But tiger beats lion.

I have listed countless facts why the lion would win. Why do you keep going on about irrelevant stuff, which you just made up? Seems likely, you maybe have mental development deficiencies, like rob, huh kid..

Tiger hunts bear, its a natural fact.. I know tigers hunt bears. I have agreed with you for this fight on this thread.

However, the tiger wins against lion. Looks like you were making stuff up, man. But it does happen. Loo up lion vs tiger national geographic.

No, its not there. No, its not there, either, — is it kid.. I see that you, are even more insane then usual. Therefore, I am not listening to a word you say.

Are you an idiot or a flamer? I thing that the grizzly has the advantage because the have huge claws and powerful paws they have been known to break the backs of wolves and black Bears with one swipe.

I read a few people mention that tigers are used to hunting prey larger than the grizzly. Do any of you know just how large a full grown moose is?

And something like ft tall. You also compare the grizzly apparently on the same scale as the brown bear. The grizzly although a relative to the brown bear is much fiercer and larger.

When you see a brown bear in the woods, you just keep an eye on them. If you see a grizzly in the woods, you keep a gun on him. Seems like a very biased article with no real facts from actual encounters.

Back in roman era, exotic beast were pitted against each other for betting and show purpose. They fed mostly on the great herds bufalo, now which are few.

An Alaskan biologist from Montana told me these were the largest of the North American bears, including the Polar Bear.

In the Time-Life leather-bound books about the old west, one them stated death matches were held between plains grizzly bears vs lions and tigers for amusement and gambling.

The matches were held in either pits or cages. In all cases stated in the book, the plains grizzly won…in less than 60 seconds.

The lions and tigers had no chance to stalk or ambush. It was one on one, face to face, no chance to run. The Plains Grizzlies were like modern day MMA fighters on high protein diets all packed with muscle and fast.

James, man you are a feline fanboy; that too a very hardcore one. You are trying to make big cats sound like they are some kind of unbeatable killing machines, which was destined to kill.

Just remember they too have their limits and tendencies, for e. Oh, that idiot is a disgrace to animal research. Man, I thought you were long gone!

In fact, there is no need.. You can see for yourself on the wildlife videos, for such a masterly lion is truly.. Big cats are pretty lit, but to think they can take out elephants like James says… B.

A tiger wins against both lion and bear. In fact, their is no need either to imagine what a Grizzly bear can do.

Certainly such a lardy layer is of negative value in a combat with a true killer.. Plus, any bear that has only ever felt the bite of his own kind — at worst..

The shit one comes across while drinking, the answer is one all over the net there are plenty of cage matches sadly enough where bears are put to fight big cats including tigers.

I have read that Siberian tigers prey on brown bears, but of course these are smaller than them not the really large ones.

If you really think a tiger would win, I say, search the web for these clips. For anyone who loves an animal, it is easy to see why people are so passionate on both sides but everything I saw in the unnatural habitat of a cage match showed a bear winning against lions, tigers, and even other bears — oh my.

I aint afraid to post the appropos vid-link.. Fact is, a prime boss big panthera — rips fat-as brownie.. Sorry about that vid-link.. You are the Idiot Tony.

I can only hope you gain wisdom as you get older. You really need to open your mind young man. He meant Kodiak bears, as in grizzly bears, which are the same animal dumbass.

I still see you two idiots trying to debate facts. I gave up arguing with idiots like you and James. They take you down to their level and beat you with experience.

They are only slightly bigger on average. Siberian tigers hunt, kill and fight off Kamchatka bears. Put that together, idiot.

Your sticky dumpster-derived bear crap stinks.. They do not have the same power A brown bear has significantly more swiping force than a S-Tiger.

Bears are more fierce and has more weight. If they both stand on their hind legs head on the bear will trample the tiger. BB, Do some research.

Lay off the LSD. A Tigers best chance is when a bear is hibernating or total surprise. Panthera bite is like-wise, that of a true killer-carnivore, not a garbage eater..

Lol a black bear from a southern climate. They are small and weak. Tigers have a far better chance against a huge grizzly or Kodiak than a flea bitten lion.

Or — if you do want to learn, then actually review the science, as in relevant published papers, via google scholar, instead.

James, wow, does no amount of evidence convince you? Most written accounts show tigers are greater than lions and I provided yet another source.

Flea bitten tick infested lions depend on a pride to survive. They must hunt with numbers because alone they seldom survive for too long.

Bears and Tigers do it solo. Meaning you ignore — most — fact-checked evidence, because the facts — upset your over-valued fantasies..

Its a natural fact kid, learn to accept it. James, every time you insult me or Gary, you have to realize you still are giving no evidence to prove your point.

You simply dance around the subject. You just insult me and Gary seven eighths of the time, and the other one eighth, you just states your hopeless opinion.

Sad that my name Jack starts with the same letter as yours. I wish my name was Tony. There you go again. Yeah, I know tiger beats bear.

I use reliable sources, not garbage comments which eighty percent of the people are with me on the lion vs tiger thing. All that proves is that bulk idiots abound — on sites like this.

Dude, eighty percent of the people there have common sense! And look at me with a straight face, and say National Geographic is a garbage resource.

People like you, are idiots! You think a lion alone will take down a fully grown elephant. Your so stupid, James. You think everyone except for you and a few other fanboys are idiots.

Wake up, you stupid idiot! The useless drivel that he is constantly spouting out is sheer bias. He never stated actual fact and all the links he provides are bogus.

Lions have only one advantage and that is a mane to protect them from a neck bite. Otherwise the Tiger has every physical advantage. Teeth, claws, strength, bite force to that of a Lion.

He just needs to get over it. Furthermore you must have struggled in math. Nowhere do I say a Tiger would typically defeat a grizzly or polar bear.

I do however believe all 3 would dispatch a flea bitten lion the majority of the time. Opinions are only as good as the facts which support them, kid.

Grizzly bear is an dangerous adversary even for a male Tiger. Thats not quite fair,how about a siberian tiger the largest cat on the earth.

But against the largest bear on earth the kodiak brown bear,is all most twice as big and fearsest,as alion or tiger. Brown bear has the advantage unless a lucky kill by the line.

I am not referring to the grizzly bear but the big brown bear in Alaska that can go to pounds and over 11 feet tall. It would not be a contest if they were both alert the bear is packed with dense fat and muscle.

James W, Just like African lion vs Grizzly bear, this fight can go either way. The bear has the strength advantage, while the tiger has the speed and agility advantage.

For a human to be packed with dense fat is a bad thing. However, bears are different. They can hunt large prey like moose and bison.

Their bellies are the only parts which are fat. Their back, legs, and arms are muscle. That is pure muscle, which gives them strong forearms.

James W, Please do some research. You will learn that that hump, is actually muscle — that is why bears have strong forearms.

Do some research about the fat protecting the bears to. Also, big cats are better hunters, but when it comes to fighting, both bears and big cats are equally matched with a slight edge to the bear.

The key to victory for the tiger are its hind legs. When the two engage the hind legs with their long claws would seriously damage the torso of the bear.

So many of these comments are ridiculous, saying tigers win because they have been known to hunt brown bears.

Grizzlies are much heavier than tigers, and have much, much, much thicker hides and layers of fat. Tigers are designed to pierce through thinner hides and hunt with surprise attacks.

There is no difference between a grizzly bear and a brown bear. How can you be such a fool? Mountain lions are on the record as doing this to bears, so a massive Amur certainly would do it too, but in an even more savagely effective manner..

One scientific explanation for this that I read is that fat in the central area of your body provides more kinetic energy to the force of your arms.

You can be fat due to lack of exercise, or you can be fat just by nature but actually very physically fit. Bears are fat by nature: I think a big brown bear would win vs tiger mostly due to bone mass.

The reason we may think that tigers supposedly hunt bears is that its always the tiger that makes the choice to attack a bear.

And what tiger would ever try significantly risk his life? So the tigers always attack the weaker bears, and also tigers hunt in packs.

This is why momma bears are so protective of their cubs. Fart, Tyson in his prime was a lean, mean KO machine! No fat-pad paunch on him then, nor on any real champ.

Fact is, some tigers do hunt bears, despite being naturally risk-averse. You are right, Tyson in his prime was lean and muscular.

Apu the lying, cheating, scamming, sociopath.. A tiger could never get to any vital organs on a bear that size with all that fur and fat. The bear is way tougher and far more durable.

Tigers have a hard time fighting with some of the smallest bears in the world which are sloth bears. Then there are Kodiak grizzlies which get up to pounds and polar bears too.

Both way more powerful than a tiger. The fight can go either way. The bear is stronger, but the tiger is faster and more agile.

You seriously need to stop being biased. James W, Honestly, both pantherines are pretty much equal when it boils down to evolutionary adaptations — but if you examine the anatomy of both cats, you will realize that the tiger has a slight edge.

This larger cranial volume also gives the tiger stronger jaws than the lion, which is yet, another advantage in combat. Not to mention that while lions fight a lot, tigers also have their fair share of fighting experience — tigers often have to fight to death in order win the heart of a female or to protect their territory.

That being said, the lion is no slouch in any of the departments where the tiger gets the upper hand or, shall I say, paw: The tiger, on the other hand, has black stripes, which allows it to camaflouge itself while hunting.

The lion is able to wrestle large prey like Cape Buffalo, but it takes more time and effort. Also, check this link out: It says that before poaching and habitat destruction, Bengal tigers used to grow OVER pounds — almost twice the size of an African lion!

AP, can you provide evidenc for your claims? AFAIK, lion hunts are the most successful of the big cats, due to their socially cooperative approach, which enables them to bring down even mega-fauna prey species..

A Polar Bear vs. A Tiger vs Grizzly think about everything the bears has make sure to calculate in the weakness do the same with the Tiger.

Tiger one shot slow it down 5 shots thing would be limbing away, and 10 shots time for Tiger soup. A one shot rifle vs bear with surprise 1 mile away not nice knowing you.

The Siberian Tiger for being close to the same size as a grizzly. Is much more agile, quicker and stronger. It will be behind the Grizzly and on its back before it even knows what happened.

If the bear can deliver one blow of front feet towards the tigers head…its done! Go on Youtube and check out that video of a pound mother sloth bear who protects her cub from an adult tiger.

I would give it for the Tiger. The tiger would be powerful enough to wrestle the Grizzly to the ground and go for a neck bite.

To sum everything up, if the tiger manages to wrestle a Grizzly or a Kodiak bear to the ground and get a neck bite, it would win.

This is the expertise a skilled full-time killer — puts to work, to his decided advantage. James W, Yes, I have done anatomical study.

Check this link out: Indeed, the tiger is a far better killer than the bear. James W, Really man? How I am arrogant?

How is that arrogant? I am not giving a tiger any tips — I am just stating the most realistic way a tiger could kill a bear.

But the two guys are practically the same except for the fact that one is stronger. But a tiger and a bear are completely different animals.

They have different body structures. Plus, the hump on their back is pure muscle — that gives them powerful forearms.

But in overall strength, the bear takes the cake by a slight margin. Do try to grasp some reality, boy.. But when taking on larger and stronger prey, they certainly use their paws — google it.

Plus, killing a pound muscle bound moose with one paw swipe takes a lot of strength — that is the point. It does not matter how the muscle is developed.

As long as the bear is strong enough to fight the tiger — that is all that matters. Jeeze… Did I say that fat is muscle?!

Nature does not give things without reason. If you imagine you do.. Do you, even in your most lurid dream of superstitions.. If such a rare event.. The vid shows a bear with a calf kill..

But Mooses antlers can also meausure up to 6ft. When tigers are hunting, they will just go for the neck. And the bear, as mentioned earlier, is used to this also.

Tigers have a vast range of skilled options to employ when confronting many different animals.. You seem to forget that the most ferocious opponent a male tiger must defeat..

Some tigers choose to prey on bears.. No bear would be tolerated in his hunting grounds.. In a hunt, tigers will use a variety of skills indeed, but like most big cats except the jaguar they will first go for the neck.

Just like a male tiger must defend his territory from another male tiger, a male grizzly must do the same also.

Both are very territorial animals, in case you did not know…. You never learn, do you? Fights between big cats are very vicious, however, to say that fights between bears are pathetic, is frankly, ludicrous.

Go on Youtube and see fights between male grizzlys — they are hella violent. Wait, why are you mentioning lions, this is a Grizzly bear vs Siberian tiger thread?

Just like lions assert their dominance, tigers and bears do the same. In fact, sometimes tigers and bears will go out and also kill other animals because they either want to invade their territory, or they are threatening their cubs.

APey, ok, I can see you are escalating.. Just let me know when you are done weeping about your precious lion… than we can have an adult like debate… LMFAO.

Not that he could actually learn anything.. Small in land grizzly bears in Montana have been studied and have been scientifically proven to through pound dumpsters like beach balls.

I have family who live in grizzly country and one of there friends shot a grizzly bear point blank with a shotgun and lived the friend escaped though while the bear was stunned from the shot.

Big cats do of course.. Just look it up or are you too lazy you ass wipe. The legs of the moose are even bigger than the lion itself.

Those heads have antlers that are 6ft long so chill a moose can kill a lion but lions can also kill a moose check reports of moose attacks on people they are pretty hard core.

He is truly an idiot. But Iap, I just wanted to tell you that while it would be very difficult, a full grown male lion in his physical prime does have the potential to take down a full grown moose.

No bear can do.. Black bears also can climb up trees they do it just as fast as your big cats do actually can you provide a source of a lion being a good climber.

But cats, even real big ones.. Iap never denied that lions can climb trees, he just requested that you provided evidence as to how lions are GOOD climbers.

In your first video, the food was not kept to high, thus the lion did not have to really climb. Your second video mainly featured small lionesses.

In the case of the big males, the tree was not to tall either. Lions, tigers, and jaguars are capable of climbing tall trees, but their massive size makes it difficult for them.

Also if you ever realized that when people think of big tough lumberjacks they tend to relate them to big tough grizzlies. Also grizzlys never need to climb besides when the cubs.

A fat-as bear simply cannot climb a pole. Also that burger was at a family reunion in a park and my uncle made burgers but some vegan protesters walked up to us and started freaking out because of how we were having a barbecue.

Hey Lames W, The problem is, Lames W the joker has not provided any links to back his ludicrous claims — thus it is impossible to examine them when they are non-existent… LOL.

What have you provided, Lames W? Wait, I forgot… bullshit. You have provided bullshit… LMAO. Lame-ass Whore, What is that disgusting, rotten thing that died on your neck?

Wait, never mind, it was your head…L. Your lame attempts to cite trash sites.. Accept it and be happy.

Read Also

0 Comments on Tiger vs bear

Ich denke, dass Sie nicht recht sind. Geben Sie wir werden es besprechen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM, wir werden umgehen.

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *